Proof of the Gaussian Integral Using the Wallis Integral

Page content

Proposition

The following holds:

ex2dx=π

Proof

Lemma

For x0, the following inequalities hold:

1x2<ex2<11+x2

Proof of the lemma

For x0,

ex>1+x

In fact, the right-hand side is the Taylor expansion truncated after the second term of the left-hand side, representing the tangent line of y=ex at x=0.

Since y=ex is convex (as ex>0 even after two derivatives), y=ex lies above the tangent line y=1+x.

Therefore, ex>1+x holds.

By substituting x2 for x in this inequality, we get 1x2<ex2.

Also, substituting x2 for x and taking the reciprocal gives ex2<11+x2.

Substitution in the Wallis Integral

Consider the Wallis integral

Im=0π2sinmxdx

Substitution y=cosx

By subsituting y=cosx for I2n+1,

I2n+1=0π2sin2nxsinxdx=10(1y2)n(dydx)dx=01(1y2)ndy=01(1x2)ndx

Substitution y=cotx

By subsituting y=cotx for I2n+1,

I2n2=0π2sin2nx1sin2xdx=01(1+y2)n(dydx)dx=01(1+y2)ndy=01(1+x2)ndx

Evaluation of the Gaussian Integral

Let

I=0ex2dx

By substituting x=ny,

I=0eny2ndy=n0enx2dx

From the lemma,

n01(1x2)ndx<n01enx2dx<I<n0dx(1+x2)n

Since the leftmost and rightmost terms are in the same form as the Wallis integral after substitution, we ultimately have:

nI2n+1<I<nI2n2

As seen from Wallis' Formula,

limmmIm=π2

so,

nI2n+1=n2n+12n+1I2n+112π2=π2(n)

nI2n2=n2n22n2I2n212π2=π2(n)

Therefore,

I=π2

Adjustment of the Integration Interval

Since the integrand is an even function,

ex2dx=2I=π

Thus, the result is proved.